Custom Nursing Writing

PICOT Question And Literature Search

dennis

·

·

SHARE

Latest news

Tags

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

PICOT Question And Literature Search

PICOT Question And Literature Search

https://customnursingwriting.com/picot-question-and-literature-search/

Assessment Description

The first step of the evidence-based practice process is to evaluate a nursing practice environment to identify a nursing problem in the clinical area. When a nursing problem is discovered, the nurse researcher develops a clinical guiding question to address that nursing practice problem.

For this assignment, you will create a clinical guiding question know as a PICOT question. The PICOT question must be relevant to a nursing practice problem. To support your PICOT question, identify six supporting peer-reviewed research articles, as indicated below. The PICOT question and six peer-reviewed research articles you choose will be utilized for subsequent assignments.

Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete this assignment.

  1. Select a nursing practice problem of interest to use as the focus of your research. Start with the patient population and identify a clinical problem or issue that arises from the patient population. In 200–250 words, provide a summary of the clinical issue.
  2. Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT question in your selected nursing practice problem area of interest. The PICOT question should be applicable to your proposed capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
  3. The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project.
  4. Conduct a literature search to locate six research articles focused on your selected nursing practice problem of interest. This literature search should include three quantitative and three qualitative peer-reviewed research articles to support your nursing practice problem.

Note: To assist in your search, remove the words qualitative and quantitative and include words that narrow or broaden your main topic. For example: Search for diabetes and pediatric and dialysis. To determine what research design was used in the articles the search produced, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The author will provide a description of data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods. Systematic Reviews, Literature Reviews, and Metanalysis articles are good resources and provide a strong level of evidence but are not considered primary research articles.  Therefore, they should not be included in this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

NRS-433V -RS1-LiteratureEvaluationTa

The first step of the evidence-based practice process is to evaluate a nursing practice environment to identify a nursing problem in the clinical area. When a nursing problem is discovered, the nurse researcher develops a clinical guiding question to address that nursing practice problem.

For this assignment, you will create a clinical guiding question know as a PICOT question. The PICOT question must be relevant to a nursing practice problem. To support your PICOT question, identify six supporting peer-revised research articles, as indicated below. The PICOT question and six peer-reviewed research articles you choose will be utilized for subsequent assignments.

Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete this assignment.

Picot question created( Do obese patients (P) who receive nutritional education, diet and exercise (I), in comparison to those who do not (C), have improved health outcomes and weight loss (O) in a year’s time limit (T)?)

Select a nursing practice problem of interest to use as the focus of your research. Start with the patient population and identify a clinical problem or issue that arises from the patient population. In 200–250 words, provide a summary of the clinical issue.

Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT question in your selected nursing practice problem area of interest. The PICOT question should be applicable to your proposed capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project.

Conduct a literature search to locate six research articles focused on your selected nursing practice problem of interest. This literature search should include three quantitative and three qualitative peer-reviewed research articles to support your nursing practice problem.

Note: To assist in your search, remove the words qualitative and quantitative and include words that narrow or broaden your main topic. For example: Search for diabetes and pediatric and dialysis. To determine what research design was used in the articles the search produced, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The author will provide a description of data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods. Systematic Reviews, Literature Reviews, and Metanalysis articles are good resources and provide a strong level of evidence but are not considered primary research articles. Therefore, they should not be included in this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Attachments

NRS-433V -RS1-LiteratureEvaluationTable.d

PICOT Question and Literature Search – Rubric

Criteria Description

Summary of Clinical Issue

5. 5: Excellent

6 points

A clinical issue is thoroughly described. The issue relates to nursing practice.

4. 4: Good

5.64 points

A clinical issue is presented. The issue relates to nursing practice. Minor detail is needed for clarity.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.98 points

A clinical issue is summarized. The issue generally relates to nursing practice.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.5 points

A clinical issue is partially presented. It is unclear how the clinical issue relates to nursing practice. Significant aspects are missing, or there are inaccuracies.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A clinical issue is omitted or is not relevant to nursing practice.

Criteria Description

PICOT Question

5. 5: Excellent

12 points

A PICOT question is clearly presented. The PICOT question format is applied accurately and presents an answerable and researchable question.

4. 4: Good

11.28 points

A PICOT question is provided. The PICOT question format is applied accurately. Some detail is need for support or clarity.

3. 3: Satisfactory

9.96 points

A PICOT question is provided. The PICOT question format is generally applied. Some information or revision is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9 points

A PICOT question is provided but is incomplete. The PICOT question format is used incorrectly.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A PICOT question is not included.

Criteria Description

APA-Formatted Article Citations With Permalinks

5. 5: Excellent

6 points

Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are accurately presented in APA format.

4. 4: Good

5.64 points

Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in APA format. There are minor errors.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.98 points

Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented in APA format, but there are errors.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.5 points

Article citations and permalinks are presented. There are significant errors in the APA format. One or more links do not lead to the intended article.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Article citations and permalinks are omitted.

Criteria Description

Relationship of Articles to the PICOT Question

5. 5: Excellent

12 points

Each article clearly relates to the PICOT question. The articles provide strong support for the PICOT question.

4. 4: Good

11.28 points

Each article relates to the PICOT question. The articles provide support for the PICOT question.

3. 3: Satisfactory

9.96 points

At least one articles does not relate to the PICOT question. The remaining articles provide general support for the PICOT question. One or two different articles are needed to provide better support for the PICOT question.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9 points

At least two articles do not relate to the PICOT question. The remaining articles provide a small degree of support for the PICOT question. Different articles are needed to provide better support for the PICOT question.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Three or more articles do not relate to the PICOT question.

Criteria Description

Quantitative and Qualitative Articles

5. 5: Excellent

12 points

Six research articles are presented. Each article meets the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed study. An ability to identify the different types of research design used in a study is consistently demonstrated.

4. 4: Good

11.28 points

Six research articles are presented. One article does not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed study. A general ability to identify the type of research design used in a study is demonstrated.

3. 3: Satisfactory

9.96 points

Six research articles are presented. Two articles do not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed study. Some ability to identify the type of research design used in a study is demonstrated.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9 points

Six research articles are presented. Three articles do not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Fewer than six research articles are presented. Four or more articles do not meet the assignment criteria for a quantitative, qualitative,

Criteria Description

Purpose Statements

5. 5: Excellent

6 points

Purpose statements are accurate and clearly summarized.

4. 4: Good

5.64 points

Purpose statements summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies in some.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.98 points

Purpose statements are presented. There are minor omissions in some areas, or major inaccuracies.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.5 points

Purpose statements are referenced but are incomplete in some areas.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Purpose statements are omitted or are incomplete overall.

Criteria Description

Research Questions

5. 5: Excellent

6 points

Research questions are accurate and capture the fundamental question posed by the researchers in each study.

4. 4: Good

5.64 points

Research questions are presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity in some areas.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.98 points

Research questions are presented. The research question has been misidentified or misinterpreted for one of the articles. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the research question for one or two articles.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.5 points

Research question is presented for each article. The research question has been misidentified or misinterpreted for at least two of the articles. Additional information is needed to fully illustrate the research question for several of the articles.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Research questions are omitted or are incomplete overall.

Criteria Description

Outcome

5. 5: Excellent

6 points

Research outcomes are accurate and described in detail for each article.

4. 4: Good

5.64 points

Research outcomes are presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity in some areas.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.98 points

Research outcomes are presented. The research outcome has been misidentified or misinterpreted for one of the articles. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the research outcomes for one or two articles.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.5 points

Research outcome is presented for each article. The research outcome has been misidentified or misinterpreted for at least two of the articles. Additional information is needed to fully illustrate the research outcomes for several of the articles.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Research outcomes are omitted or are incomplete overall.

Criteria Description

Setting

5. 5: Excellent

6 points

The setting in which the researcher conducted the study is detailed and accurate for each article.

4. 4: Good

5.64 points

The setting is indicated for each article. Some detail is needed to fully illustrate the physical, social, or cultural site in which the researcher conducted the study.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.98 points

The setting is indicated for each article. The setting described for one article is inaccurate or incomplete.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.5 points

The setting is indicated for each article. The setting described for two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The setting is omitted for one or more of the articles. The setting described for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete.

Criteria Description

Sample

In:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Other news

  • Discussion: Presidential Agendas NURS 6050

    Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy. Discussion: Presidential Agendas NURS 6050 Discussion: Presidential Agendas NURS 6050 https://customnursingwriting.com/discussion-presidential-agendas-nurs-6050/ Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little […]

  • DQ; What is the difference between research- and evidence-based practice projects?

    Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy. NUR 699 GC Week 1 Discussion 1 What is the difference between research- and evidence-based practice projects? Provide an example of each one and the reason for the difference. Why should nurses be interested in learning about EBP?     Order Now Did […]

  • DQ: What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (e.g., validity, reliability, and applicability)?

    Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy. NUR 699 GC Week 3 Discussion 2 What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (e.g., validity, reliability, and applicability)? Which is the most important? Why? Order Now Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games […]